Edward Snowden has become one of the most polarizing figures in America these days. However, he is not in America - last I knew, he was in a Moscow airport, awaiting his next movement to an undisclosed country without extradition to the United States.
A brief refresher for those not familiar with the story. Snowden was an ex-National Security Agency contractor who leaked out information about a spying apparatus that was being used on American and British citizens. Since leaking out the information, he has gone off the grid and is reportedly being assisted in his attempt to "get away" by WikiLeaks and its controversial director, Julian Assange. The end result is to get Snowden to Ecuador, who has offered him asylum. Ecuador also offered Assange protection, as he currently resides in its embassy in London.
This morning the father of Snowden appeared on NBC's 'Today' show, where he defended his son, saying he did not commit treason and that "those who surround" his son are bad influences.
"I love him. I would like to have the opportunity to communicate with him. I don't want to put him in peril, but I am concerned about those who surround him," said Lonnie Snowden. "I think WikiLeaks, if you've looked at past history, their focus isn't necessarily the Constitution of the United States. It's simply to release as much information as possible. So that alone is a concern for me."
"You know, at this point I don't feel that he's committed treason. He has, in fact, broken U.S. law in the sense that he has released classified information. And if folks want to classify him as a traitor -- in fact, he has betrayed his government. But I don't believe that he's betrayed the people of the United States," he added.
How do you view Edward Snowden?
Anonymous 2, none of this prevents the implementation of a backdoor to the data storage, or even just a privileged user account. It's just giving someone else the access that developers and moderators on Facebook already have. In fact, it's just giving them the same access you have, without enforcing the privacy settings of other users. There really isn't anything to it. Besides, almost all of the companies involved in the meantime had to retract their denials and admit that Snowden's information was the truth.
Encryption is good. Of course the people who the agencies claim to be after would already be using similar measures to not get caught. That is the biting irony of the whole thing. If someone were clever enough to actually plan a successful terrorist attack (or whatever), you'd think they'd also be clever enough to not use public, global, unencrypted communication channels. It's ridiculous. All the NSA could hope to find would be some armchair extremists, if they're lucky, but not people with the means and intent to do any real harm. It's like with airport security: put up a big dramatic show for your customers, give them a feeling of security so they don't get too afraid and stop flying; just hope they don't think about it, and realise that actual terrorists would probably not have much trouble finding a way around regular airport security.